A: The Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. is a
grower-initiated and funded program designed to eliminate the boll
weevil from the cotton fields of Texas.
A: The state Legislature has given the Texas Boll Weevil
Eradication Foundation, Inc., the authority for the implementation of
eradication throughout the state. The Texas Department of Agriculture
(TDA) has been given responsibility for holding referenda and has
oversight of the Foundation's operations. TDA also sets the assessment
each year, which cannot exceed the maximum amount approved in a
referendum and approves the due dates for those assessments.
A: The Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation is a non-profit
organization initiated and funded by Texas cotton producers, with
oversight from the Texas Department of Agriculture, created to
collectively eliminate the costly, cotton boll weevil from Texas
cotton. The mission of the Foundation is to eliminate the boll weevil
from Texas cotton fields in the most efficient, cost-effective and
environmentally sensitive manner possible.
A: The Texas Legislature established the Texas Boll Weevil
Eradication Foundation in 1993 to carry out a statewide boll weevil
eradication program. The state is broken up into 16 boll weevil
eradication zones. Cotton producers in each of the Texas zones had to
vote in a referendum on whether or not to start a program in their
zone and to approve a yearly assessment to pay for the program. Once a
zone voted to move forward with a program, the Texas Foundation
proceeded to carry out program activities associated with the boll
weevil eradication program.
The Southern Rolling Plains zone, around San Angelo and Ballinger, was
the first to start the program on 220,000 cotton acres in the fall of
1994. Subsequently, it also became the first zone in Texas to be
declared functionally eradicated (no weevil reproduction) in Sept.
2000.
In 2009, the statewide program covered more than 5.45 million cotton
acres in 16 Texas and four New Mexico zones. To date, 11 of the 16
Texas zones have already been declared either suppressed or
functionally eradicated.
A: Texas cotton producers spend about $70 million dollars each year
to control the boll weevil. Despite their efforts, the boll weevil
causes an estimated $200 million in crop losses each year. Eradication
has been proven to increase yield, lower production costs and
eliminate the use of pesticides for the boll weevil.
A: The boll weevil is native of Mexico and Central America. It was
first introduced into the United States near Brownsville, Texas, in
about 1892.
By 1922, the pest had spread into cotton growing areas of the United
States from the eastern two-thirds of Texas and Oklahoma to the
Atlantic Ocean. The boll weevil colonized northern and western
portions of Texas during a subsequent range expansion that occurred
between 1953 and 1966. By 1981, the insect was well established in
parts of California, northwestern Mexico and Arizona.
Boll weevil egg punctures
The egg hatches in three to five days producing a larvae. About
three days after the larvae begins feeding in a square, the square
turns yellowish-green, bracts flair open and the square drops from the
plant. When small bolls are infested, they do not fall from the plant.
Boll weevil larvae feed inside the square or boll for seven to 14
days, after which they change to the pupal stage. After
emergence from the pupal stage, the adult chews its way out and, in a
few days, begins to lay eggs for the next generation.
Punctured squares in which eggs are laid usually fall off the plant
with the resulting loss of that fruiting position. Boll damage may
range from one damaged lock to loss of the entire boll. A common
occurrence is boll rot because of weevil damage.
The damage resulting from this activity negatively
affects the profitability of cotton through the loss of production as
well as cotton quality. These factors have a significant impact on
Texas’s cotton industry and the state’s economy as a whole. In fact,
The National Cotton Council estimates that the boll weevil has cost
U.S. cotton producers more than $13 billion since entering from Mexico
a century ago (National Cotton Council, 1994).
Yield losses attributed to the boll weevil, the cost of
insecticide control, environmental considerations, infestation of
secondary pests, and insect resistance have all resulted in an
aggressive effort to develop a Beltwide strategy for eradicating the
boll weevil in the United States.

Q: How can I determine
if a field is infested?
A: While cotton is in the fruiting stage:
1. Look for flared squares, which are often
yellowed.
2. Check blooms for feeding adult weevils.
3. Look for damaged, misshapen bolls which may harbor weevils.
4. Look for “cells” inside bolls which may contain weevils.
5. Check squares for signs of feeding and egg laying damage shown by
the presence of yellow-orange pollen grains.

Q: Why is it necessary
for all growers in an area to participate in boll weevil
eradication?
A: Boll weevils migrate. They move around
primarily as airborne adults. In the spring, movement from hibernation
sites is usually steady across a field, but adults may fly to distant
portions of a field or to distant fields. Throughout the summer,
movement within and between fields occurs randomly, but the greatest
movement activity occurs in the spring and late summer. As cotton
matures, weevils move from fields to surrounding fields seeking food
and hostable cotton plants to deposit eggs, or they may move to
hibernation sites.
Although most growers judiciously apply control measures to boll
weevil-infested acreage in almost all such areas, 5-20 percent of the
infested acreage may receive inadequate or no control treatments
(Knipling, 1979). This uncontrolled acreage harbors populations
capable of re-infesting neighboring areas. Models developed by
Knipling (1979) demonstrate that if only 10 percent of a population
remains untreated, that portion of the population can develop normally
and redistribute throughout the entire area
after only four generations—less than one growing season. Also,
judicious application of control measures cannot protect against
reinfestation from neighboring areas the following season. Thus,
growers who treat their acreage are faced with a continuing need to
reapply insecticide to control infestations.
The National Cotton Council estimates that the boll weevil has cost
U.S. cotton producers more than $13 billion since entering from Mexico
a century ago (National Cotton Council, 1994).
Yield losses attributed to the boll weevil, the cost of
insecticide control, environmental considerations, infestation of
secondary pests, and insect resistance have all resulted in an
aggressive effort to develop a Beltwide strategy for controlling the
boll weevil in the United States.
Overall movement by individual weevil flights is influenced strongly
by wind currents. Weevils moving into cotton fields in the spring are
able to feed on young plants, even in the cotyledon stage, but females
cannot reproduce until squares are large enough to feed on and to lay
an egg in the feeding puncture. This requires flower buds about the
size of a pencil eraser.
Males moving into a field containing fruiting cotton settle down to
feed, releasing pheromone and attracting females. Females moving into
the field respond to this pheromone and move little after mating.
Early infestations, therefore, tend to occur in clumps.

Q: How is the program
funded?
A: Cotton producers and crop-sharing landowners pay the majority of
program expenses. Some cost-share funds are available from the state
and federal government.
Because assessments do not cover all the operating costs each year,
loans are obtained to cover the deficit. As the program progresses,
costs decrease and assessments are used for debt reduction. When
debt-reduction costs drop, so do assessments.
After a zone has repaid its debt, a maintenance fee will be charged.
Experience in other eradication programs has shown that this charge is
minimal.

Q: How is eradication
accomplished?
A: The main components of eradication are
mapping,
trapping
and
treatment.
First, all cotton fields are mapped using Global Positioning Satellite
technology.
Longitude and latitude
coordinates are downloaded to produce maps that provide information
used by field techs and aerial applicators to locate fields. The data
is also integrated into other information systems to allow program
employees to quickly and easily determine which fields should receive
treatments.
Next, traps are placed on the perimeter of the fields.
These traps are the "eyes" of the program and provide Foundation
personnel with data on boll weevil activity while also removing
weevils from the field.
Program employees place yellow-green, cone-shaped pheromone traps
around the perimeters of all cotton fields. The pheromone attractant
(lure) is a man-made copy for the natural aggregation and sex
attractant used by weevils to communicate to each other where weevils
are gathering to feed and reproduce. The pheromone-baited traps are
very effective in determining the presence of boll weevils in cotton
fields. Because the traps contain an insecticide strips, they function
as a control method as well. They are helpful in reducing weevil
populations in the later phases of the eradication process.
Control is primarily accomplished through:
- the use of good cultural practices such as early planting
and harvest and the timely removal of hostable material from
fields,
- and insecticide applications.
Most insecticide applications are performed by aerial
applicators, but in areas where this is not possible or near
sensitive areas, such as schools, hospitals, nursing homes, housing
developments or ecologically sensitive areas, ground rigs are used
to apply the insecticide.
The Foundation treats cotton fields that meet treatment criteria
with malathion ULV, a chemical also used in mosquito control, at a
rate of 12 ounces per acre. Malathion is most commonly applied by
aerial application, however, where that is not possible or near
environmentally sensitive areas (lakes, schools, churches), an
application may be made with a ground sprayer.
Spraying begins when cotton reaches pinhead square stage and
continues until harvest or a killing freeze. Typically, less
spraying is done during the middle of the cotton season to preserve
beneficial insects.

Q: How are
aerial applicators hired?
A: Each work unit's contract is let on the basis of competitive
bids. An applicator's past performance may be taken into account
before the contract is given. During the season, each applicator's
work is evaluated, and failure to observe program protocols may result
in a contract being given to another applicator. All applications are
monitored to ensure adherence to program protocols.

Q: How long will
eradication take?
A: Already, 97 percent of the cotton grown in the United States is
weevil free. Some experts project complete eradication in the next
four to five years.

Q: How do
growers benefit from the program?
A: Because the boll weevil is the most consistent threat to cotton,
a large part of a grower's insecticide costs go to weevil control.
Eradicating the weevil results in higher yields and lower costs.
After eradication, costs for all cotton-pest control also tends to
decrease through the resurgence of beneficial insects and values
usually increase.

Q: How does
the general public benefit?
A: Fewer insecticides are introduced into the environment, and the
area's economy improves. The damage caused by boll weevils goes far
beyond the destruction of cotton bolls. Studies have shown that
millions of dollars are lost to communities through the loss of trade
and jobs associated with the support industries because grower income
is reduced. In some cases, growers leave agriculture altogether and
may leave their communities to find employment, taking their families
and business with them.

Q: How
does eradication affect other insects?
A: Malathion is detrimental to other insects, including beneficials
and honey bees.
The foundation closely monitors the activities of other cotton pests,
such as beet armyworms and aphids, and will reduce control efforts if
these populations grow too large to make sure beneficial insect
populations that help control these pests are not reduced. The
Foundation works with beekeepers to make sure hives are not affected
by eradication treatments.

Q: Will I
be informed before my fields are sprayed?
A: Yes. If trap catches indicate a need for your field to be
sprayed, a field unit supervisor will call you the night before the
spraying is scheduled.
You can aid the effort by making sure you provide the FUS with your
correct phone number, making sure your answering machine, if you have
one, is on, or providing the FUS with an alternate number if you can't
be reached or if a message cannot be left.
Anyone else who may be affected by the spraying, such as consultants,
will also be informed if the FUS is provided with the appropriate
phone number.

Q: Who
decides a zone is eradicated?
A: The Foundation keeps detailed records of trapping data. When
that data shows very little weevil activity taking place, program
personnel will join with extension personnel to determine if
reproducing populations are present.
If no reproducing populations are present, the Foundation's program
director will present the data to the Foundation's Technical Advisory
Committee for review. The committee is composed of experts from the
state's universities, the Agricultural Extension Service, USDA-APHIS
and the National Cotton Council.
If the committee agrees with the findings, the information is
forwarded to TDA for further review. TDA has developed guidelines for
determining whether an area qualifies for a declaration of
eradication.
If this review of the data meets the criteria, the commissioner will
make the declaration of eradication.

Q: What
efforts are made to prevent reinfestation once eradication is
accomplished?
A: TDA has developed rules designed to protect grower investment in
eradication.
An eradicated zone is released from quarantine and the movement of
cotton, harvesting equipment and cotton by-products from an
uneradicated zone to or through an eradicated zone will be strictly
regulated.
Besides these rules, growers in eradicated zones are watchful to make
sure no threat to their investment is allowed in their area.

Q: How much
will the assessment be?
A: The assessment cannot exceed the maximum set in the referendum.
The assessment will probably be set at the maximum for at least six
years to ensure adequate cash flow to pay for the program and
associated debt.

Q: What if I
plant cotton but destroy it before harvest?
A: Some zone steering committees request a credit be given on the
assessment for failed acres. The amount of the credit varies by zone,
but in all instances, fields must kept free of hostable cotton through
the end of the growing season before a credit will be applied.
Steering committee recommendations are reviewed by the Foundation's
Board of Directors and forwarded to the commissioner of agriculture
for approval. The commissioner sets the assessment rate for all zones.
In later years of the program, the amount of cotton planted in a zone
usually rises dramatically. In older, active zones, steering
committees have requested that all cotton planted be charged some or
all of the assessment even if the crop is later failed. This takes
care of the continuing costs of mapping and trapping fields and
ensures adequate cash flow and prompt repayment of the zone's debt.

Q: What if I
can't afford the assessment?
A: Because this cost is usually fixed, many growers include the
assessment in their operating loan. However, you may make arrangements
with the Foundation to pay the assessment in installments. A small
late fee is added to any unpaid balance.

Q:
What if I don't pay at all?
A: A lien may be placed against the cotton grown for the current
crop year. The Foundation's lien does not have priority over other
liens that may be attached to your cotton.
If the Foundation lien does affect you, you will not be able to sell
your crop or receive the proceeds from the sale of the crop until you
have paid your outstanding balance for that crop year.
Again, the Foundation will work with you to make arrangements to pay
your assessment.
